TOP STORIES
06:24 PM EDT on Monday, August 23, 2004
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Working some overtime today? It may not mean what it
used to.
New rules from the Bush administration took effect Monday -- concerning
just who's eligible for overtime pay.
The Labor Department says about 107,000 white-collar workers now
eligible for overtime pay who earn $100,000 or more annually could lose
it under the new rules.
A liberal Washington think-tank says six-million workers will lose
benefits.
Meantime, several hundred union members marched outside the Labor
Department to protest new regulations. Two senators pledged to roll them
back when Congress returns from recess.
Protesters, many wearing union T-shirts, carried signs such as
"President Bush: Hands off my overtime pay," and chanted, "Come on all
you billionaires, give us wages that are fair."
"The fight is not over yet," said Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of
Pennsylvania, an opponent of the changes who is facing a tough
re-election bid in November.
There is little agreement by the Bush administration, employer groups,
labor experts and others on how many workers will gain or lose the right
to overtime pay under the new rules in the Fair Labor Standards Act.
"To be candid, no one knows," said Jerry Hunter, a labor lawyer at Bryan
Cave LLP in St. Louis and former general counsel of the National Labor
Relations Board during the first Bush administration.
Employers have sought changes for decades, complaining the regulations
were ambiguous and out of date, and questioning why highly paid
professionals should get overtime pay. Labor unions, however, say the
new rules are intended to reduce employers' costs by cutting the number
of workers who are eligible for overtime pay.
Estimates of how many workers will lose their overtime eligibility range
from 107,000 to 6 million. Workers who could become newly eligible range
from very few to 1.3 million.
"Not only is the Labor Department unsure, but a lot of people in a lot
of industries are unsure," Hunter said. "This is all very fluid right
now."
The major overhaul, the first in more than half a century, is aimed at
mostly white-collar workers. The Labor Department says manual laborers
and other blue-collar workers will not be affected.
The new rules are intended to limit workers' multimillion-dollar
lawsuits, many of them successful, claiming they were cheated out of
overtime pay for working more than 40 hours a week.
Retailers, restaurants, insurance firms and banks have been targets, and
jobs in those places are generally exempted from overtime in the new
rules. They include chefs, pharmacists, funeral directors, embalmers,
journalists, insurance claims adjusters, low- and midlevel bank managers
and dental hygienists.
Whether the new rules will reduce litigation is questionable, experts
said. Lawyers representing workers have found the suits lucrative.
"This has become a very big area of plaintiffs' employment law, and it
is not simply going to go away because of these new regulations," said
Bill Schurgin, a labor lawyer in the Chicago office of Seyfarth Shaw.
Critics say the changes will eliminate overtime for millions of
middle-class Americans struggling in a weak jobs market.
"These are drastic changes that will hurt working families," said Karen
Nussbaum, executive director of Working America, an AFL-CIO organization
created for workers unable to join unions.
Labor Secretary Elaine Chao has created a task force that will be
"looking very closely and critically at any reclassifications that
result in workers losing their overtime status," said Steven Law, deputy
secretary.
No new funds have been added, but the department's Wage and Hour
Division "will be very, very carefully monitoring and following up with
enforcement," especially in high-violation industries, he said. The
department won $212 million in back wages for overtime violations in
2003, a 21 percent increase.
At Denver Water, a public utility, none of the 1,050 employees will be
reclassified, said benefits manager Jim Crockett.
"We were in compliance before, and when I analyzed the jobs for the new
rules, it came up that no changes were necessary," he said.
When in doubt, the utility classifies workers as overtime-eligible,
Crockett said. For example, its survey chiefs are in the field only
during summer months supervising crews; the rest of the year they
oversee few workers, if any. But the chiefs are given overtime status,
he said.
About 1.3 million workers, mostly low- and midlevel managers at stores
and restaurants, who earn less than $23,660 a year will be newly
eligible. However, employers can avoid paying them overtime by raising
their salaries, so critics say far fewer will benefit from overtime.
For white-collar workers who fall between those salary levels, their
overtime status depends on their job duties and experience. The rules
revamp the definitions of professional, administrative and executive
employees, called "duties tests," that are used to determine eligibility.
For example, professional employees exempt from overtime had
professional degrees. The new rule allows employers to substitute work
experience and instruction.
Executive employees had authority to hire and fire. The new rule expands
that provision, saying an executive can make recommendations that carry
weight regarding employment status.
Labor leaders say slight changes in wording could exempt millions from
overtime pay. The Labor Department says duties are more clear and make
status more certain, resulting in "few, if any" losing overtime.
The changes will prompt "a whole new round of litigation to determine
what these phrases mean," said Baldwin Robertson, a Washington labor
lawyer hired by Working America to answer workers' questions on its Web
site.
More Top Stories
Today's Most Read Stories
Fireworks explosion on Ocracoke Island kills one, injures four
Fireworks in Hampton Roads to celebrate Independence Day
Rip current, inexperience prove deadly for mother at Oceanfront
Forums, Photos & More
Explore: Find Web sites making news in our Links in the News section.
Keep Up: Have 13News headlines delivered to your RSS reader.
Tell us: Is there something you believe 13NEWS should investigate? Please let us know.
Popular Stories






You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name