02:17 PM EDT on Friday, July 8, 2005

From Dept. of Defense

AP

A new study is the strongest evidence yet that Agent Orange is associated with adult-onset diabetes, the Department of Defense said Friday.

It's the third and final report for a 20-year study on long-term health issues related to the herbicide's use.

The Air Force Health Study compiled results of the 2002 physical examination of 1,951 veterans.

Called The Ranch Hand Study, it was named after the operation responsible for spraying herbicides in Vietnam between 1962 and 1971 to deny cover and destroy crops of the North Vietnamese Army.

Since the first exam in 1982, the Air Force has looked at pilots and ground crews from that operation and whether their health problems can be attributed to Agent Orange and its contaminant, dioxin.

The study suggests that as dioxin levels increase, not only are the presence and severity of adult-onset diabetes increased, but the time to onset of the disease is decreased.

A 166 percent increase in diabetes requiring insulin control was seen in those with the highest levels of dioxin.

Cardiovascular disease findings were not consistent, but separate studies have found an increased risk of cardiovascular death in Ranch Hand enlisted ground crews, the subgroup with the highest average serum dioxin.

Overall, Ranch Hand pilots and ground crews examined in 2002 had not experienced a statistically significant increase in heart disease relative to the comparison group. Associations between measures of cardiac function and history of heart diseases and herbicide or dioxin exposure were not consistent or clinically interpretable as adverse.

Other findings included an increase in the frequency of reported acne after service in Southeast Asia in Ranch Hand enlisted ground crew members, but the lack of corresponding patterns of skin lesions observed at the physical examination rendered this finding difficult to interpret.

Finally, several blood tests regarding liver function and blood lipids were elevated and did tend to increase with dioxin level. However, these tests may be elevated for many reasons, do not constitute a disease by themselves and cannot be explained by other findings in the study.

At the end of the 20 years of follow-up, Ranch Hand pilots and ground crews as a group exhibited no statistically significant increase in the risk of cancer relative to comparisons. Differences by military occupation were inconsistent.

Most importantly, the Ranch Hand enlisted ground crews, the subgroup with the highest dioxin levels and presumably the greatest herbicide exposure, exhibited a 14 percent decreased risk of cancer. These results do not suggest that herbicides or dioxin exposure are related to cancer in these veterans.

The report, along with many other studies on herbicide and dioxin exposure, will be reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. Based upon this review, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs can ask Congress for legislation on disability compensation and health care.

STUDY LIMITATIONS:

First, the results cannot be generalized to other groups, such as all Vietnam veterans or Vietnamese civilians, which have been exposed in different ways and to different levels of herbicide.

Second, the size of the study makes it difficult to detect increases in rare diseases, thus small increases in rare diseases may be missed by the study.

Third, other variables that were not considered in this report could be confounding factors influencing the results.